Pole qualifying for the Indy 500 took a dramatic flip because the Group Penske vehicles of Josef Newgarden and Will Energy have been pulled out of line as a result of unapproved elements on the rear of the automobile. The ensuing motion for the infraction despatched each vehicles to the again of the sector. All focus has been on the modifications to the rear attenuators on the No. 2 and 12 vehicles, however there may be far more to this story. Not as a result of the modifications are new, or simply for the five hundred. They’ve really existed for over a 12 months and made appearances at a number of sorts of tracks.
What’s a rear attenuator?
With a view to perceive what transpired at Group Penske, we have to begin with the perform of the rear attenuator on an IndyCar. This rectangular piece sits in the back of the automobile and is hooked up to the gearbox the place it serves two primary roles. Its major function is to soak up influence in a crash and scale back the g-forces felt by the driving force. It additionally serves because the mount for the rain mild meeting.
Facet-by-side comparability of an Indy automobile’s rear attenuator
Photograph by: IndyCar
The present base model of the rear attenuator was revealed by IndyCar in February of 2023 and was the most important improve to the half since 2016 as Dallara was in a position to enhance their Finite Factor Evaluation (FEA) instruments and design an extended half that would scale back influence to the driving force as famous by Tino Belli, director of aerodynamic growth for INDYCAR on the time.
“The entire idea is to attempt to carry the height G’s down, make them even decrease and even unfold the crush over an extended distance. This attenuator is longer than the one we have now now. Dallara’s FEA – Closing Factor Evaluation – of crushing constructions has bought significantly better over time, in order that they have been in a position to mannequin it significantly better just about earlier than we took it to an influence check.”
The earliest batch of these rear attenuators that was launched to begin the 2023 season regarded completely different than what we see in the present day at Indianapolis because the smoothed panels in query for the Group Penske penalties didn’t exist but.
Dallara IndyCar bulletin in regards to the required modification for the rear attenuator for the Indy vehicles, 2023.
Photograph by: Dallara
The attenuators went via quite a lot of updates through the 2023 and 2024 seasons with the primary necessary replace coming in Could of 2023 that required groups to return attenuators to Dallara in an effort to strengthen them internally after points in races early on within the season.
Dallara up to date bulletin for IndyCar concerning mandated Indy 500 rear attenuator modification, 2023
Photograph by: Dallara
One other bulletin was launched simply a few weeks later and instructed groups to take away the brand new attenuator and revert to the 2022 model on the path of IndyCar for the 2023 Indy 500. Groups have been instructed to change these older attenuators in an effort to match mounting elements from the newer model.
One other bulletin from Dallara issued in 2024 on necessary modifications wanted for the rear attenuator
Photograph by: Dallara
The brand new model of the attenuator noticed its largest change at first of the 2024 season as a compulsory replace required panels to be bonded internally and externally in an effort to make the attenuator stronger based mostly on FEA evaluation. The bonded panels on the surface which are in query within the present Group Penske penalties make their first look right here as attenuators are despatched again to Dallara in an effort to have these panels added.
Previous to this replace the attenuators have been one easy piece, however now these carbon panels are glued to the surface in an effort to enhance energy of the general piece. The illustration above reveals what the attenuators regarded like previous to the beginning of the 2024 season and in addition highlights the brand new exterior panels within the illustration in blue.
What occurred at Group Penske
Based on a number of sources that aren’t approved to talk publicly, Group Penske began receiving these up to date attenuators again from Dallara in early 2024 and members of management weren’t happy with the aesthetics of the brand new glued-on panels as they confirmed a shiny glue line that stood out and with a big raised edge. A member of the technical management is rumored to have instructed members of their staff to “clear up” the perimeters on the items in an effort to make the intense glue stand out much less so these technicians utilized a darkish compound to the perimeters and smoothed them out.
As soon as these attenuators have been modified, they have been cleaned up and coated with sealer – per the usual process for a lot of carbon fiber elements at Penske – and positioned into their elements rotation to be put in on the vehicles to begin the 2024 season.
Scott McLaughlin along with his P1 award for beginning pole for the 108th working of the Indianapolis 500, 2024
Photograph by: Penske Leisure, Chris Jones
How lengthy has Penske been utilizing the modified attenuators?
Based mostly on discussions with quite a lot of business figures and Group Penske personnel, these modified attenuators have been in use for effectively over a 12 months. We dug via the IndyCar photograph archives and have been capable of finding a straightforward instance of a modified attenuator on the again of the pole successful automobile of Scott McLaughlin on the 2024 Indy 500 as seen under.
An in depth-up of Scott McLaughlin’s rear attenuator from the photograph above taken after he earned pole for the 2024 Indy 500.
Photograph by: Penske Leisure, Chris Jones
We’ve barely zoomed into the realm in query and it’s clearly seen that there’s a smoothed space from the rear fringe of the bonded panels to the primary attenuator meeting. Extra digging reveals that the modified attenuator seems at quite a lot of tracks on the Group Penske vehicles as we are able to see within the pictures linked under which present a equally modified attenuator on the again of the No. 2 of Josef Newgarden after a crash at Street America: https://x.com/FormulaIndy/standing/1800210075279348002
Trade members have noticed the identical modified items at quite a lot of tracks in 2024 together with on the again of the Indy 500 successful automobile of Newgarden which now sits on the museum at Indianapolis Motor Speedway the place a number of have gone over in an effort to doc the piece that was put in on the again of it.
The place did IndyCar’s technical inspection fail?
The truth that Group Penske has been working modified attenuators since final season, however has solely been penalized now, brings the IndyCar technical inspection course of into query. How did these elements get missed by technical inspectors for therefore lengthy in the event that they have been so blatantly unlawful? IndyCar Technical Director Kevin “Rocket” Blanch spoke to media at Indianapolis Motor Speedway after the No. 2 and No. 12 vehicles have been pulled out of line.
“Properly there was a physique match violation on that rear attenuator in order fast as this course of occurs we ran them via tech, we bought all people in line after which proper close to the top or previous to qualifying they determined they might simply pull out of line.”
Blanch didn’t elaborate on their discovery, however in accordance with stories from the observe, the No. 12 automobile was despatched to pit lane after passing via technical inspection, however the No. 2 automobile was ultimately stopped for the modified attenuator. At that time, the No. 12 automobile was rechecked and located to have a equally modified half. Group Penske technicians determined to aim to wash up the elements to carry them again to the unique specification, however IndyCar technical inspectors didn’t approve of that work as it’s outdoors of the allowed adjustments as soon as you might be previous technical inspection and in line to qualify. Rule 8.5.6 states: “Whereas the Automobile is within the {Qualifications} line, an Entrant’s representatives could make entrance / rear wing angle, endplate angle and Tire stress changes solely. The Automobile have to be moved because the {Qualifications} line progresses. A Automobile should not go away the {Qualifications} line with out the approval of INDYCAR.”
Based on a number of sources within the IndyCar paddock, the one motive that the modifications have been found at this particular occasion was as a result of stories from different rivals to the IndyCar technical division urging them to test the Group Penske vehicles. This reveals a failure of the technical inspection course of because the elements have gone via over a season’s price of technical inspections with out ever being found till it was identified by a competing staff.
Did Group Penske achieve a bonus from the modified elements?
Smoothing out bodywork on a race automobile will typically result in velocity as it may enable air to move in a smoother method over the automobile and scale back drag so the primary assumption is {that a} smoothed out attenuator could possibly be a efficiency achieve however discussions with business consultants show in any other case.
Discussions with engineers, physique match specialists, and drivers all led to the conclusion that there isn’t laminar move throughout the perimeters of the rear attenuator which implies that the airflow over the automobile isn’t shut sufficient to the facet of that attenuator for a tough step or smoothed out transition on these items to make a distinction to the airflow coming off the again of the automobile. The truth that the modified attenuators have been discovered on highway programs as proven within the pictures above additionally seems to corroborate these theories for the reason that modified elements have been put in outdoors of ovals the place drag isn’t a spotlight as a lot as we see it at locations just like the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.
Was Group Penske penalized too harshly?
The vehicles of Josef Newgarden and Will Energy have been initially pulled from the pole qualifying session and allowed to retain their place within the Quick 12, however after extra analysis by IndyCar officers, they have been despatched to the again of the sector and can now begin thirty second and thirty third. Based mostly on the IndyCar rule guide these penalties have been seemingly too harsh as rule 8.5.13.1.7 states that “The outcomes of Day 1 {Qualifications} when thirty-four (34) or extra Automobiles have entered the occasion shall decide: 8.5.13.1.7.1 Positions one (1) via twelve (12) have secured a beginning place and can take part within the “High 12” group on Day 2.”
Moreover rule 8.5.13.2.6.5 states that “Any Automobiles not in a position to start or full a required {Qualifications} try shall be ranked on the rear of the “High 12” group so as of Day 1’s {Qualifications} instances.”
Based mostly on the foundations above, the No. 2 and No. 12 vehicles had secured their method into the High 12 as quickly because the scoring sheet from the primary day of {qualifications} was signed, so the strongest penalty they need to have obtained was to be scored eleventh and twelfth based mostly on the wording of the rule guide. IndyCar officers used their discretion in an effort to go above and past what’s explicitly written within the rule guide, seemingly because of the nature of the prominence of the race and the purpose at which these things have been found.
Did Group Penske violate the foundations?
IndyCar technical inspection could have failed to find the modified elements for months and sure penalized the 2 Group Penske entries a bit too harshly. Wanting intently on the wording within the rule guide, the elements have been certainly less than the listed specs.
Rule 14.7.8.16.1 has a really express checklist of elements that may be modified an states that “The next elements could also be blended to scale back uneven surfaces and gaps. Exhausting edges could also be tapered or blended. These elements should stay separate elements and there have to be a definite joint line defining every half from its mounting floor or half(s). They have to detach from their mating half(s) with the removing of the Tridairs or bolts. All meant shapes and radii should stay as designed. No tongue-and-groove, dovetail, or different sorts of physique becoming will probably be permitted. Further fasteners are permitted.”
The itemizing of that rule has sixteen traces price of elements which are allowed to be modified and the rear attenuator just isn’t on that checklist, which implies that Group Penske violated this rule after they smoothed the transition on the rear attenuator.
The very best case situation for imposing this rule would have been for IndyCar officers to catch the adjustments after they first appeared on observe final season and penalize them with a financial or factors high-quality at the moment much like what we see for Prema’s current penalty for modifying a spec half. Since this modified half was missed for therefore lengthy and solely found at IMS this week, IndyCar technical officers additionally had the choice to inform Group Penske to swap the elements for conforming ones throughout any of the sooner technical inspections through the week. Sadly it seems that the elements weren’t found till competing groups raised alarms with IndyCar technical inspectors so the state of affairs reached a foul situation that was made even worse by Group Penske technicians making an attempt to return the elements to authentic spec.
Why did McLaughlin’s automobile not get penalized?
The No. 3 automobile of Scott McLaughlin was the one automobile that escaped penalties this week and that is because of the truth that it had an unmodified rear attenuator as confirmed by IndyCar after they seized the elements from his authentic Indy 500 automobile which was concerned in a crash. Based on inner sources at Group Penske that aren’t approved to talk publicly, the No. 3 automobile had an attenuator from the newest batch that had come from Dallara and no modifications have been made to it as technical management was happy with the fitment of the externally hooked up panels and didn’t see unpleasant glue on the perimeters so technicians made no adjustments to these elements.
The No. 2 and No. 12 vehicles have been utilizing attenuators that have been from an earlier batch and had been cleaned up and resealed after which put again into service after use in earlier races. Attenuators don’t sometimes get faraway from companies until there may be crash injury to the automobile that will compromise them so it isn’t stunning to see them cleaned up and reused a number of instances.
As soon as the modified attenuators have been recognized and banned, Group Penske pulled extra attenuators from the newest batch that they obtained from Dallara and put in them on the No. 2 and No. 12 vehicles.
Different penalties
Many have known as for added penalties corresponding to eradicating the vehicles from the race or eradicating previous wins that will have concerned these elements, and my perception is that these calls go method too far — very like shifting the entries to thirty second and thirty third went too far for the reason that outcomes have been signed off. Particularly as a result of the vehicles utilized in these races will not be longer out there to be checked.
What IndyCar ought to do sooner or later…
It’s unlucky that one of many largest tales of the week is concentrated on an element that was seemingly modified for aesthetic functions however Group Penske violated an express rule from the IndyCar rule guide and regardless that they might not see a efficiency benefit from it, they nonetheless made adjustments to a single-source half. Group Penske representatives ought to have introduced the elements to IndyCar officers in the event that they wished to change them and gotten approval earlier than doing so.
IndyCar technical inspectors additionally bear some accountability on this entire scandal as a result of they missed these modifications for over a 12 months and solely penalized Group Penske after competing groups raised alarms through the largest race of the 12 months. Technical inspection procedures must be evaluated for the longer term and they need to contemplate introducing digital imaging of bodywork as seen in different main collection like IMSA and NASCAR which might rapidly catch any physique half that may be out of spec. IndyCar also needs to contemplate implementing a elements restore portal much like what NASCAR has finished in an effort to streamline approvals for any repairs or modification to single supply elements.
On this article
Bozi Tatarevic
IndyCar
Will Energy
Josef Newgarden
Scott McLaughlin
Group Penske
Be the primary to know and subscribe for real-time information electronic mail updates on these matters
Subscribe to information alerts
